GE Announces the Successful Completion of the Open Cycle of the Azito Phase IV Power Plant, Generating Approximately 8% of Ivory Coast Current Installed Electricity CapacityRead more Eco Atlantic Acquires Additional Participating Interest in Block 3B/4B Offshore South AfricaRead more Cellulant Recognised as a Leading Payment Platform Solutions Provider in Nigeria for its Tingg PlatformRead more Binance Signs Cristiano Ronaldo for Exclusive PartnershipRead more Human Rights Volunteer Roles to Return for FIFA World Cup QatarRead more White House ‘Social Media Summit’: No Facebook, No Twitter, No Transparency CopyRead more White House ‘Social Media Summit’: No Facebook, No Twitter, No TransparencyRead more White House ‘Social Media Summit’: No Facebook, No Twitter, No TransparencyRead more White House ‘Social Media Summit’: No Facebook, No Twitter, No TransparencyRead more White House ‘Social Media Summit’: No Facebook, No Twitter, No TransparencyRead more

Supreme Court to hear attack on Obamacare as Covid-19 pandemic widens

Print Friendly and PDF

Nov 10, 2020 - 03:32 AM

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump’s lame-duck administration makes a last try in the US Supreme Court Tuesday to demolish the “Obamacare” health program, which could cancel the health insurance of millions in the middle of a pandemic.

The high court will hear arguments in the long-brewing case over the constitutionality of the 2010 Affordable Care Act, under which then-president Barack Obama’s government sought to extend health insurance to people who could not afford it.

Since taking office in 2017, Trump has tried to undermine the ACA, first eroding one key provision through legislation, and then seeking to cancel it altogether, backing a lawsuit by Texas and several other Republican-led states.

After federal district and appeals courts sided with Texas, the case was appealed earlier this year to the nine justices of the Supreme Court by California and states which support the ACA.

20 million could lose insurance 

Trump’s adding three conservative justices to the court since 2017 could be enough to strike down ACA legislation.

But doing so could be pyrrhic.

More than 20 million Americans are insured under the law, including poor adults who became able to access the Medicare program normally open only to retired people over 65; young people 26 years old or less the ACA allowed to be covered by their parents’ insurance; and people whose preexisting medical conditions led to their being denied commercial health insurance.

And the legal challenge comes during the Covid-19 pandemic which has seen more than 10 million Americans infected with the virus.

As much as he has attacked the ACA, trying to cut related budgets and services, Trump has not yet offered alternatives that would cover those losing insurance if the law is struck down.

“Obamacare will be replaced with a MUCH better, and FAR cheaper, alternative if it is terminated in the Supreme Court,” Trump claimed by tweet in September.

Focus on Barrett 

Tuesday’s hearing comes a week after Trump was defeated at the polls for a second term by Democrat Joe Biden.

Biden was Obama’s vice president when the ACA was established, and has promised to improve it.

While the program has proven popular, it stands at risk on technical legal grounds, at a Supreme Court which has turned sharply to the right since Trump came to power.

In 2012 the court voted, 5-4, to uphold the law as constitutional. Chief Justice John Roberts, a moderate conservative, sided with the court’s four liberals to decide the case.

But since then Trump has named three new justices, all conservatives. That, even without Roberts’ vote, gives them five votes out of nine.

All eyes will be on the newest justice, Amy Coney Barrett, whose appointment Trump rushed through in October, saying he wanted her in position to help decide any election cases as well as the ACA case.

When still a law professor, she criticized Roberts’ reasoning in the 2012 decision to uphold the ACA.

She was pressed intensely by Democrats during her Senate confirmation hearings last month on her view of the program and Trump’s expectations of her.

“I’m not hostile to the ACA,” she said. “I made no promises to anyone. I don’t have any agenda.”

Whatever the court decides, it won’t likely be known until next year, possibly after Trump leaves office and Biden is president on January 20.

LMBCPOLITICS.COM uses both Facebook and Disqus comment systems to make it easier for you to contribute. We encourage all readers to share their views on our articles and blog posts. All comments should be relevant to the topic. By posting, you agree to our Privacy Policy. We are committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion, so we ask you to avoid personal attacks, name-calling, foul language or other inappropriate behavior. Please keep your comments relevant and respectful. By leaving the ‘Post to Facebook’ box selected – when using Facebook comment system – your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below. If you encounter a comment that is abusive, click the “X” in the upper right corner of the Facebook comment box to report spam or abuse. You can also email us.